A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning future neighbours more than the construction of a wall in a coastal site in a very north Dublin suburb, a case which includes attracted national focus adhering to an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed household property at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of setting up breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Situations posting about René Collier plus the Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a neighborhood disagreement has progressed right into a really publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a corporation director respectively, seek out to build their family property. The case is becoming emblematic of broader disputes along Ireland’s coastline, in which development pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of founded residents. In accordance with the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming made by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath scheduling authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their scheduling authorization by creating a wall past the boundaries in their web-site, leading to an encroachment on the Particular Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such parts are topic to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental law. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically within a delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially constructed, is in the right placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the action as an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal organizing disputes, where views of the sea are both equally very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described spectacular attempts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the location, according to sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via waist-substantial water in the course of a storm to photograph the site Irish Occasions, an image which has due to the fact come to be emblematic with the depth of the dispute. These steps weren't just symbolic; they have been intended to gather visual proof from the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the h2o during severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm h2o to photograph the internet site turned Among the most placing descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that this kind of actions had been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into an area affected by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was being encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up lined intimately via the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become extensively searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court heard further more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important instant inside the authorized timeline.
In the Main of your dispute is often a disagreement more than boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve the wall, as manufactured, goes over and above what was approved and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has actually been described as meticulous in his assessment of planning documents, maps, and situations attached to your authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally pressured that their motion is determined by worry for environmental safety and adherence to planning law. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting alternatively that it is about ensuring that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they have got explained their extensive-standing relationship to the area as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few just trying to build a loved ones house in accordance Together with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on a Distinctive Location of Conservation and say that every one operates are carried out based on Experienced assistance and authorized programs. Their legal professionals have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as entering The ocean in the course of a storm, tend not to change the fundamental specifics.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how organizing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute around design of wall at coastal web page is becoming a shorthand description to get a situation that numerous observers see as ever more typical. As sea levels rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation amongst personal land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become extra contentious.
The Irish Periods article about René Collier famous the businessman had Formerly been involved with nearby advocacy on setting up and environmental challenges, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from quite unique Skilled backgrounds can find on their own aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-significant h2o all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments and René Collier waded by way of waistline-superior drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting equally the physical fact from the coastline and also the symbolic mother nature from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an extreme solution.
Since the High Court proceedings go on, the result remains uncertain. The courtroom should identify whether or not the wall as built complies with arranging permission and no matter if any encroachment into a Specific Place of Conservation has transpired. The lawful arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and planning ailments. Nevertheless the human ingredient continues to be central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other long following the lawful expenditures are paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around building will work at the website on Dublin Street, Sutton, even so the implications of the situation extend further than that deal with. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the necessity of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition it underscores how rapidly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential troubles including environmental protection and assets rights are perceived to René Collier be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a place of purely natural elegance and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful queries. Whether or not it'll in the end be altered, taken off, or concluded as prepared will rely on the courtroom’s results. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will probable go on to appear in headlines, connected indelibly to Probably the most closely viewed preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.